% Reviewer 2
\reviewer

% TODO =================
% 总结
\begin{generalcomment}
% TODO √ R2 总结
The subject is interesting and it is suitable for "Chaos". Nevertheless there are many things that should be considered in the paper.
\end{generalcomment}

\begin{revmeta}[We sincerely thank the reviewer for their thorough and insightful feedback on our manuscript.] 
Your detailed suggestions have been instrumental in identifying areas for improvement and have greatly contributed to enhancing the overall quality and rigor of our study.
\end{revmeta}

% 总结
\begin{*generalcomment}
% TODO √ R2 总结
The subject is interesting and it is suitable for "Chaos". Nevertheless there are many things that should be considered in the paper.
\end{*generalcomment}

\begin{revmeta}[We sincerely thank the reviewer for their thorough and insightful feedback on our manuscript.] 
Your detailed suggestions have been instrumental in identifying areas for improvement and have greatly contributed to enhancing the overall quality and rigor of our study.
\end{revmeta}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 分解的问题

% 单问题
% TODO √ R2 Bonferroni
\begin{*revcomment}
For example, the statistical tools are not explicitly indicated. They simply indicate in page 5, line 1 that Bonferroni correction is used but nothing else regarding the statistical tests are named.  
% 例如，统计工具没有明确指出。他们只是在第5页第1行简单地指出使用了 Bonferroni 修正，但没有提到其他关于统计检验的名称。
\end{*revcomment}

\begin{revresponse}[Thank you for pointing out the lack of clarity in the statistical analysis section. We acknowledge that the description of the statistical tools used was incomplete.]
123
\end{revresponse}
